https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da88e7027a34a44de84f6d8d5a96d262c29080a7

commit r15-7370-gda88e7027a34a44de84f6d8d5a96d262c29080a7
Author: Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site>
Date:   Sun Feb 2 21:22:36 2025 +0800

    vect: Fix wrong code with pr108692.c on targets with only non-widening ABD 
[PR118727]
    
    With things like
    
      // signed char a_14, a_16;
      a.0_4 = (unsigned char) a_14;
      _5 = (int) a.0_4;
      b.1_6 = (unsigned char) b_16;
      _7 = (int) b.1_6;
      c_17 = _5 - _7;
      _8 = ABS_EXPR <c_17>;
      r_18 = _8 + r_23;
    
    An ABD pattern will be recognized for _8:
    
      patt_31 = .ABD (a.0_4, b.1_6);
    
    It's still correct.  But then when the SAD pattern is recognized:
    
      patt_29 = SAD_EXPR <a_14, b_16, r_23>;
    
    This is not correct.  This only happens for targets with both uabd and
    sabd but not vec_widen_{s,u}abd, currently LoongArch is the only target
    affected.
    
    The problem is vect_look_through_possible_promotion will throw away a
    series of conversions if the effect is equivalent to a sign change and a
    promotion, but here the sign change is definitely relevant, and the
    promotion is also relevant for "mixed sign" cases like
    r += abs((unsigned int)(unsigned char) a - (signed int)(signed char) b
    (we need to promote to HImode as the difference can exceed the range of
    QImode).
    
    If there were any redundant promotion, it should have been stripped in
    vect_recog_abd_pattern (i.e. when patt_31 = .ABD (a.0_4, b.1_6) is
    recognized) instead of in vect_recog_sad_pattern, or we'd have a
    missed-optimization if the ABD output is not summerized.  So anyway
    vect_recog_sad_pattern is just not a proper location to call
    vect_look_through_possible_promotion for the ABD inputs, remove the
    calls to fix the issue.
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            PR tree-optimization/118727
            * tree-vect-patterns.cc (vect_recog_sad_pattern): Don't call
            vect_look_through_possible_promotion on ABD inputs.
    
    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
    
            PR tree-optimization/118727
            * gcc.dg/pr108692.c: Mention PR 118727 in the comment.
            * gcc.dg/pr118727.c: New test case.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108692.c |  1 +
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr118727.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc       | 11 ++---------
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108692.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108692.c
index 13a27496ad9f..eeee22032817 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108692.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr108692.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 /* PR tree-optimization/108692 */
+/* PR tree-optimization/118727 */
 /* { dg-do run } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-vectorize" } */
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr118727.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr118727.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2ee5fa782362
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr118727.c
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/118727 */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-vectorize" } */
+
+__attribute__((noipa)) int
+foo (signed char *x, signed char *y, int n)
+{
+  int i, r = 0;
+  signed char a, b;
+  for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
+    {
+      a = x[i];
+      b = y[i];
+      /* Slightly twisted from pr108692.c.  */
+      int c = (unsigned int)(unsigned char) a - (signed int)(signed char) b;
+      r = r + (c < 0 ? -c : c);
+    }
+  return r;
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  signed char x[64] = {}, y[64] = {};
+  if (__CHAR_BIT__ != 8 || __SIZEOF_INT__ != 4)
+    return 0;
+  x[32] = -1;
+  y[32] = -128;
+  if (foo (x, y, 64) != 383)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  return 0;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
index 5aebf9505485..6fc97d1b6ef9 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
@@ -1405,15 +1405,8 @@ vect_recog_sad_pattern (vec_info *vinfo,
       tree abd_oprnd0 = gimple_call_arg (abd_stmt, 0);
       tree abd_oprnd1 = gimple_call_arg (abd_stmt, 1);
 
-      if (gimple_call_internal_fn (abd_stmt) == IFN_ABD)
-       {
-         if (!vect_look_through_possible_promotion (vinfo, abd_oprnd0,
-                                                    &unprom[0])
-             || !vect_look_through_possible_promotion (vinfo, abd_oprnd1,
-                                                       &unprom[1]))
-           return NULL;
-       }
-      else if (gimple_call_internal_fn (abd_stmt) == IFN_VEC_WIDEN_ABD)
+      if (gimple_call_internal_fn (abd_stmt) == IFN_ABD
+         || gimple_call_internal_fn (abd_stmt) == IFN_VEC_WIDEN_ABD)
        {
          unprom[0].op = abd_oprnd0;
          unprom[0].type = TREE_TYPE (abd_oprnd0);

Reply via email to