https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc6b949c553a3be1ce4d6671fb8a9de213ede114
commit r15-7271-gdc6b949c553a3be1ce4d6671fb8a9de213ede114
Author: Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>
Date:   Tue Jan 28 12:00:06 2025 -0800

    split-path: Small fix for poor_ifcvt_pred (tsvc s258) [PR118505]
    
    After r15-3436-gb2b20b277988ab, poor_ifcvt_pred returns false for
    the case where the statement could trap but in this case trapping
    instructions cannot be made unconditional so it is a poor ifcvt.
    
    This fixes a small preformance regression with TSVC s258 at
    `-O3 -ftrapping-math` on aarch64 where ifcvt would not happen
    and we would still have a branch.
    
    On a specific aarch64, we go from 0.145s down to 0.118s.
    
    Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            PR tree-optimization/118505
            * gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc (poor_ifcvt_pred): Return
            true for trapping statements.
    
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>

Diff:
---
 gcc/gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc b/gcc/gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc
index 7c5bc1d842c0..9db73fdcc6d4 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc
@@ -160,6 +160,11 @@ poor_ifcvt_pred (basic_block pred, basic_block bb)
   gimple *stmt = last_and_only_stmt (pred);
   if (!stmt || gimple_code (stmt) != GIMPLE_ASSIGN)
     return true;
+
+  /* If the statement could trap, then this is a poor ifcvt candidate. */
+  if (gimple_could_trap_p (stmt))
+    return true;
+
   tree_code code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt);
   if (poor_ifcvt_candidate_code (code))
     return true;

Reply via email to