https://gcc.gnu.org/g:314d20bbefd098ff75b366b870ac8e33ad7711ca

commit r15-7156-g314d20bbefd098ff75b366b870ac8e33ad7711ca
Author: Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date:   Thu Jan 23 11:28:15 2025 +0100

    testsuite: i386: Adjust gcc.target/i386/cmov12.c for Sun as syntax
    
    The new gcc.target/i386/cmov12.c test FAILs on Solaris/x86 with the
    native as:
    
    FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cmov12.c scan-assembler-times cmovg 3
    
    This happens because as uses a different syntax for cmov:
    
    --- cmov12.s.bu243      2025-01-21 16:55:27.038829605 +0100
    +++ cmov12.s.bu24390    2025-01-21 16:55:44.565051230 +0100
    @@ -41,9 +41,9 @@
            leal    1(%rdx), %ebp
            movl    (%r11), %esi
            cmpl    %eax, %esi
    -       cmovg   %ebp, %edx
    -       cmovg   %r11, %rcx
    -       cmovg   %esi, %eax
    +       cmovl.g %ebp, %edx
    +       cmovq.g %r11, %rcx
    +       cmovl.g %esi, %eax
    
    The problem is even more prominent with the upcoming gas 2.44 which
    added support for the Sun as syntax on Solaris, which gcc/configure
    picks up.
    
    This patch allows for both forms.
    
    Tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
    
    2025-01-22  Rainer Orth  <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>
    
            gcc/testsuite:
            * gcc.target/i386/cmov12.c (scan-assembler-times): Allow for
            cmovl.g etc.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cmov12.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cmov12.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cmov12.c
index 87de4f4117b8..3d8c358e7031 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cmov12.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/cmov12.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-do compile { target { ! ia32 } } } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -mavx2 -mtune=sapphirerapids" } */                        
     
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "cmovg" 3 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "cmov(\[lq\]\.)?g" 3 } } */
 
 void foo(int *a, int n, int k)
 {

Reply via email to