https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc8d5cac1a0e9119d3589541b21303b0388557c4

commit dc8d5cac1a0e9119d3589541b21303b0388557c4
Author: Alexandre Oliva <ol...@adacore.com>
Date:   Mon Jan 6 18:40:18 2025 -0300

    testsuite: generalize ifcombine field-merge tests [PR118025]
    
    A number of tests that check for specific ifcombine transformations
    fail on AVR and PRU targets, whose type sizes and alignments aren't
    conducive of the expected transformations.  Adjust the expectations.
    
    Most execution tests should run successfully regardless of the
    transformations, but a few that could conceivably fail if short and
    char have the same bit width now check for that and bypass the tests
    that would fail.
    
    Conversely, one test that had such a runtime test, but that would work
    regardless, no longer has that runtime test, and its types are
    narrowed so that the transformations on 32-bit targets are more likely
    to be the same as those that used to take place on 64-bit targets.
    This latter change is somewhat obviated by a separate patch, but I've
    left it in place anyway.
    
    
    for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    
            PR testsuite/118025
            * field-merge-1.c: Skip BIT_FIELD_REF counting on AVR and PRU.
            * field-merge-3.c: Bypass the test if short doesn't have the
            expected size.
            * field-merge-8.c: Likewise.
            * field-merge-9.c: Likewise.  Skip optimization counting on
            AVR and PRU.
            * field-merge-14.c: Skip optimization counting on AVR and PRU.
            * field-merge-15.c: Likewise.
            * field-merge-17.c: Likewise.
            * field-merge-16.c: Likewise.  Drop runtime bypass.  Use
            smaller types.

Diff:
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-1.c  |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-13.c |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-14.c |  3 ++-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-15.c |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-16.c | 17 +++++++----------
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-17.c |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-3.c  |  2 ++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-8.c  |  2 ++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-9.c  |  4 +++-
 9 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-1.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-1.c
index 1818e104437e..4405d40ee79d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-1.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ int main () {
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "BIT_FIELD_REF" 8 "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "BIT_FIELD_REF" 8 "optimized" { target { 
! { avr-*-* pru-*-* } } } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "cmpb" { target { i*86-*-* || x86_64-*-* } 
} } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "cmpl" 8 { target { i*86-*-* || 
x86_64-*-* } } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "cmpw" 8 { target { powerpc*-*-* || 
rs6000-*-* } } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-13.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-13.c
index 7e4f4c499347..eeef73338f8e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-13.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-13.c
@@ -90,4 +90,4 @@ int main () {
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimizing" 9 "ifcombine" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimizing" 9 "ifcombine" { target { ! { 
avr-*-* pru-*-* } } } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-14.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-14.c
index 91d84cfebf19..73259e0936e4 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-14.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-14.c
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 /* { dg-do run } */
 /* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-ifcombine-details" } */
 
-/* Check that we don't get confused by multiple conversions.  */
+/* Check that we don't get confused by multiple conversions.  Conceivably, we
+   could combine both tests using b, but the current logic won't do that.  */
 
 __attribute__((noipa))
 int f(int *a,int *d)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-15.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-15.c
index 34641e893c92..fc3846452716 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-15.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-15.c
@@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ int main () {
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimizing" 6 "ifcombine" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimizing" 6 "ifcombine" { target { ! { 
avr-*-* pru-*-* } } } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-16.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-16.c
index 2ca23ea663a4..afdaf45b6a94 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-16.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-16.c
@@ -4,17 +4,17 @@
 /* Check that tests for sign-extension bits are handled correctly.  */
 
 struct s {
-  short a;
-  short b;
-  unsigned short c;
-  unsigned short d;
-} __attribute__ ((aligned (8)));
+  signed char a;
+  signed char b;
+  unsigned char c;
+  unsigned char d;
+} __attribute__ ((aligned (4)));
 
 struct s p = { -1,  0, 0, 0 };
 struct s q = {  0, -1, 0, 0 };
 struct s r = {  1,  1, 0, 0 };
 
-const long long mask = 1ll << (sizeof (long long) * __CHAR_BIT__ - 5);
+const long mask = 1l << (sizeof (long) * __CHAR_BIT__ - 5);
 
 int fp ()
 {
@@ -50,9 +50,6 @@ int fr ()
 }
 
 int main () {
-  /* Unlikely, but play safe.  */
-  if (sizeof (long long) == sizeof (short))
-    return 0;
   if (fp () < 0
       || fq () < 0
       || fr () > 0)
@@ -63,4 +60,4 @@ int main () {
 /* We test .b after other fields instead of right after .a to give field
    merging a chance, otherwise the masked compares with zero are combined by
    other ifcombine logic.  The .c test is discarded by earlier optimizers.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimizing" 6 "ifcombine" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimizing" 6 "ifcombine" { target { ! { 
avr-*-* pru-*-* } } } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-17.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-17.c
index 06c8ec16e86c..a42658ac5c51 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-17.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-17.c
@@ -43,4 +43,4 @@ int main () {
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimizing" 4 "ifcombine" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimizing" 4 "ifcombine" { target { ! { 
avr-*-* pru-*-* } } } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-3.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-3.c
index f26e8a96ea04..a9fe404fa426 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-3.c
@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ void f (void) {
 }
 
 int main () {
+  if (sizeof (short) != 2)
+    return 0;
   f ();
   return 0;
 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-8.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-8.c
index ae270e10070e..7d49c2789013 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-8.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-8.c
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ void f (void) {
 }
 
 int main () {
+  if (sizeof (short) != 2)
+    return 0;
   f ();
   return 0;
 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-9.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-9.c
index 04df54c2b74e..49ef59847ac0 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-9.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/field-merge-9.c
@@ -29,8 +29,10 @@ void f (void) {
 }
 
 int main () {
+  if (sizeof (short) != 2)
+    return 0;
   f ();
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimizing two comparisons" 2 
"ifcombine" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimizing two comparisons" 2 
"ifcombine" { target { ! { avr-*-* pru-*-* } } } } } */

Reply via email to