https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d369ddca549b5ff7d868b8f5ee139835b1f9382a
commit r15-6475-gd369ddca549b5ff7d868b8f5ee139835b1f9382a
Author: Jeff Law <j...@ventanamicro.com>
Date: Mon Dec 30 23:40:58 2024 -0700
[RISC-V][PR target/115375] Fix expected dump output
Several months ago changes were made to the vectorizer which mucked up
several
of the scan tests. All but one of the cases in pr115375 have since been
fixed.
The remaining failure seems to be primarily a debugging dump issue -- we're
still selecting the same lmul values. This patch adjusts the dump scan
appropriately.
PR target/115375
gcc/testsuite
* gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul8-9.c: Adjust expected
output.
Diff:
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul8-9.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul8-9.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul8-9.c
index f045f857cc3f..793d16418bf1 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul8-9.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/riscv/rvv/dynamic-lmul8-9.c
@@ -14,6 +14,6 @@ foo (int64_t *__restrict a, int64_t init, int n)
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {e64,m8} } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {csrr} } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "Preferring smaller LMUL loop because it
has unexpected spills" "vect" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Maximum lmul = 8" 2 "vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Maximum lmul = 8" 1 "vect" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Maximum lmul = 4" 1 "vect" } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Maximum lmul = 2" 1 "vect" } } */
