https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8fd9461976b325efd134f9004a7958ebd008148f
commit r14-10997-g8fd9461976b325efd134f9004a7958ebd008148f Author: Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> Date: Wed Oct 23 11:30:32 2024 +0200 tree-sra: Avoid SRAing arguments to a function returning_twice (PR 117142) PR 117142 shows that the current SRA probably never worked reliably with arguments passed to a function returning twice, because it then creates statements before the call which however needs to be at the beginning of a basic block. While it should be possible to make at least the case of passing arguments by value work with SRA (the statements would need to be put just on the non-abnormal edges leading to the BB), this would mean large surgery of function sra_modify_expr and I guess the time would better be spent re-organizing the whole pass. gcc/ChangeLog: 2024-10-21 Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> PR tree-optimization/117142 * tree-sra.cc (build_access_from_call_arg): Disqualify any candidate passed to a function returning twice. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2024-10-21 Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> PR tree-optimization/117142 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117142.c: New test. (cherry picked from commit 29d8f1f0b7ad3c69b3bdb130325300d5f73aa784) Diff: --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117142.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ gcc/tree-sra.cc | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117142.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117142.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..fc62c1e58f2e --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr117142.c @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O1" } */ + +struct a { + int b; +}; +void c(int, int); +void __attribute__((returns_twice)) +bar1(struct a); +void bar(struct a) { + struct a d; + bar1(d); + c(d.b, d.b); +} diff --git a/gcc/tree-sra.cc b/gcc/tree-sra.cc index 8040b0c56451..c91e40ef7e71 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-sra.cc +++ b/gcc/tree-sra.cc @@ -1397,6 +1397,15 @@ static bool build_access_from_call_arg (tree expr, gimple *stmt, bool can_be_returned, enum out_edge_check *oe_check) { + if (gimple_call_flags (stmt) & ECF_RETURNS_TWICE) + { + tree base = expr; + if (TREE_CODE (expr) == ADDR_EXPR) + base = get_base_address (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0)); + disqualify_base_of_expr (base, "Passed to a returns_twice call."); + return false; + } + if (TREE_CODE (expr) == ADDR_EXPR) { tree base = get_base_address (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0));