https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e22882f3ec88f540c2255ddce4fb69ac69911b7

commit r15-5302-g2e22882f3ec88f540c2255ddce4fb69ac69911b7
Author: Kewen Lin <li...@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri Nov 15 03:46:33 2024 +0000

    rs6000: Rework vector float comparison in rs6000_emit_vector_compare - p4
    
    All kinds of vector float comparison operators have been
    supported in a rtl comparison pattern as vector.md, we can
    just emit an rtx comparison insn with the given comparison
    operator in function rs6000_emit_vector_compare instead of
    checking and handling the reverse condition cases.
    
    This is part 4, it further checks for comparison opeators
    LT/UNGE.  In rs6000_emit_vector_compare, for the handling
    of LT, it switches to use code GT, swaps operands and try
    again, it's exactly the same as what we have in vector.md:
    
    ; lt(a,b)   = gt(b,a)
    
    As to UNGE, in rs6000_emit_vector_compare, it uses reversed
    code LT and further operates on the result with one_cmpl,
    it's also the same as what's in vector.md:
    
    ; unge(a,b) = ~lt(a,b)
    
    This patch should not have any functionality change too.
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (rs6000_emit_vector_compare_inner): Emit 
rtx
            comparison for operators LT/UNGE of MODE_VECTOR_FLOAT directly.
            (rs6000_emit_vector_compare): Move assertion of no 
MODE_VECTOR_FLOAT to
            function beginning.

Diff:
---
 gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc | 24 ++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
index 9cde30853f76..16e7b3521019 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
@@ -16015,6 +16015,7 @@ static rtx
 rs6000_emit_vector_compare_inner (enum rtx_code code, rtx op0, rtx op1)
 {
   machine_mode mode = GET_MODE (op0);
+  gcc_assert (GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) != MODE_VECTOR_FLOAT);
 
   switch (code)
     {
@@ -16024,7 +16025,6 @@ rs6000_emit_vector_compare_inner (enum rtx_code code, 
rtx op0, rtx op1)
     case EQ:
     case GT:
     case GTU:
-      gcc_assert (GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) != MODE_VECTOR_FLOAT);
       rtx mask = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
       emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (mask, gen_rtx_fmt_ee (code, mode, op0, op1)));
       return mask;
@@ -16049,18 +16049,8 @@ rs6000_emit_vector_compare (enum rtx_code rcode,
      comparison operators in a comparison rtl pattern, we can
      just emit the comparison rtx insn directly here.  Besides,
      we should have a centralized place to handle the possibility
-     of raising invalid exception.  For EQ/GT/GE/UNORDERED/
-     ORDERED/LTGT/UNEQ, they are handled equivalently as before;
-     for NE/UNLE/UNLT, they are handled with reversed code
-     and inverting, it's the same as before; for LE/UNGT, they
-     are handled with LE ior EQ previously, emitting directly
-     here will make use of GE later, it's slightly better;
-
-     FIXME: Handle the remaining vector float comparison operators
-     here.  */
-  if (GET_MODE_CLASS (dmode) == MODE_VECTOR_FLOAT
-      && rcode != LT
-      && rcode != UNGE)
+     of raising invalid exception.  */
+  if (GET_MODE_CLASS (dmode) == MODE_VECTOR_FLOAT)
     {
       mask = gen_reg_rtx (dmode);
       emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (mask, gen_rtx_fmt_ee (rcode, dmode, op0, op1)));
@@ -16088,23 +16078,17 @@ rs6000_emit_vector_compare (enum rtx_code rcode,
       try_again = true;
       break;
     case NE:
-    case UNGE:
       /* Invert condition and try again.
         e.g., A != B becomes ~(A==B).  */
       {
-       enum rtx_code rev_code;
        enum insn_code nor_code;
        rtx mask2;
 
-       rev_code = reverse_condition_maybe_unordered (rcode);
-       if (rev_code == UNKNOWN)
-         return NULL_RTX;
-
        nor_code = optab_handler (one_cmpl_optab, dmode);
        if (nor_code == CODE_FOR_nothing)
          return NULL_RTX;
 
-       mask2 = rs6000_emit_vector_compare (rev_code, op0, op1, dmode);
+       mask2 = rs6000_emit_vector_compare (EQ, op0, op1, dmode);
        if (!mask2)
          return NULL_RTX;

Reply via email to