https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cea87c84eacdb422caeada734ba5138c994d7022
commit r15-4008-gcea87c84eacdb422caeada734ba5138c994d7022 Author: Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com> Date: Tue Oct 1 14:48:19 2024 -0700 backprop: Fix deleting of a phi node [PR116922] The problem here is remove_unused_var is called on a name that is defined by a phi node but it deletes it like removing a normal statement. remove_phi_node should be called rather than gsi_remove for phinodes. Note there is a possibility of using simple_dce_from_worklist instead but that is for another day. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. PR tree-optimization/116922 gcc/ChangeLog: * gimple-ssa-backprop.cc (remove_unused_var): Handle phi nodes correctly. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/torture/pr116922.c: New test. Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com> Diff: --- gcc/gimple-ssa-backprop.cc | 10 ++++++++-- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr116922.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-backprop.cc b/gcc/gimple-ssa-backprop.cc index fe27ef51cdf2..e3374b181386 100644 --- a/gcc/gimple-ssa-backprop.cc +++ b/gcc/gimple-ssa-backprop.cc @@ -663,8 +663,14 @@ remove_unused_var (tree var) print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, stmt, 0, TDF_SLIM); } gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_for_stmt (stmt); - gsi_remove (&gsi, true); - release_defs (stmt); + if (gimple_code (stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI) + remove_phi_node (&gsi, true); + else + { + unlink_stmt_vdef (stmt); + gsi_remove (&gsi, true); + release_defs (stmt); + } } /* Note that we're replacing OLD_RHS with NEW_RHS in STMT. */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr116922.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr116922.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..0fcf912930f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr116922.c @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-additional-options "-ffast-math" } */ +/* PR tree-optimization/116922 */ + + +static int g; + +void +foo (int c, double v, double *r) +{ +b: + do + v /= g - v; + while (c); + *r = v; + + double x; + foo (5, (double)0, &x); +}