https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e592ea8ddffb44bab52d36d9862bb39ffae4d144

commit r15-4004-ge592ea8ddffb44bab52d36d9862bb39ffae4d144
Author: Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
Date:   Tue Oct 1 15:17:18 2024 +0200

    tree-optimization/116654 - missed dr_explicit_realign[_optimized] with SLP
    
    With single-lane SLP we miss to use the power realing loads causing
    some testsuite FAILs.  r14-2430-g4736ddd11874fe exempted SLP of
    non-grouped accesses because that could have been only splats
    where the scheme isn't used anyway, but now with single-lane SLP
    it can be contiguous accesses.
    
            PR tree-optimization/116654
            * tree-vect-data-refs.cc (vect_supportable_dr_alignment):
            Treat non-grouped accesses like non-SLP.

Diff:
---
 gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.cc | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.cc
index fe7fdec4ba0d..920e3c120a66 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.cc
@@ -7170,11 +7170,11 @@ vect_supportable_dr_alignment (vec_info *vinfo, 
dr_vec_info *dr_info,
             same alignment, instead it depends on the SLP group size.  */
          if (loop_vinfo
              && STMT_SLP_TYPE (stmt_info)
-             && (!STMT_VINFO_GROUPED_ACCESS (stmt_info)
-                 || !multiple_p (LOOP_VINFO_VECT_FACTOR (loop_vinfo)
-                                 * (DR_GROUP_SIZE
-                                      (DR_GROUP_FIRST_ELEMENT (stmt_info))),
-                                 TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (vectype))))
+             && STMT_VINFO_GROUPED_ACCESS (stmt_info)
+             && !multiple_p (LOOP_VINFO_VECT_FACTOR (loop_vinfo)
+                             * (DR_GROUP_SIZE
+                                  (DR_GROUP_FIRST_ELEMENT (stmt_info))),
+                             TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (vectype)))
            ;
          else if (!loop_vinfo
                   || (nested_in_vect_loop

Reply via email to