https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b14a5823b685e3a604dc17b02c033f60ad90414

commit r15-3580-g9b14a5823b685e3a604dc17b02c033f60ad90414
Author: Pan Li <pan2...@intel.com>
Date:   Wed Sep 11 09:54:38 2024 +0800

    Vect: Support form 1 of vector signed integer .SAT_ADD
    
    This patch would like to support the vector signed ssadd pattern
    for the RISC-V backend.  Aka
    
    Form 1:
      #define DEF_VEC_SAT_S_ADD_FMT_1(T, UT, MIN, MAX)           \
      void __attribute__((noinline))                             \
      vec_sat_s_add_##T##_fmt_1 (T *out, T *x, T *y, unsigned n) \
      {                                                          \
        for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; i++)                         \
          {                                                      \
            T sum = (UT)x[i] + (UT)y[i];                         \
            out[i] = (x[i] ^ y[i]) < 0                           \
              ? sum                                              \
              : (sum ^ x[i]) >= 0                                \
                ? sum                                            \
                : x[i] < 0 ? MIN : MAX;                          \
          }                                                      \
      }
    
    DEF_VEC_SAT_S_ADD_FMT_1(int64_t, uint64_t, INT64_MIN, INT64_MAX)
    
    If the backend implemented the vector mode of ssadd, we will see IR diff
    similar as below:
    
    Before this patch:
     108   │   _114 = .SELECT_VL (ivtmp_112, POLY_INT_CST [2, 2]);
     109   │   ivtmp_77 = _114 * 8;
     110   │   vect__4.9_80 = .MASK_LEN_LOAD (vectp_x.7_78, 64B, { -1, ...  }, 
_114, 0);
     111   │   vect__5.10_81 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<vector([2,2]) long unsigned 
int>(vect__4.9_80);
     112   │   vect__7.13_85 = .MASK_LEN_LOAD (vectp_y.11_83, 64B, { -1, ...  
}, _114, 0);
     113   │   vect__8.14_86 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<vector([2,2]) long unsigned 
int>(vect__7.13_85);
     114   │   vect__9.15_87 = vect__5.10_81 + vect__8.14_86;
     115   │   vect_sum_20.16_88 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<vector([2,2]) long 
int>(vect__9.15_87);
     116   │   vect__10.17_89 = vect__4.9_80 ^ vect__7.13_85;
     117   │   vect__11.18_90 = vect__4.9_80 ^ vect_sum_20.16_88;
     118   │   mask__46.19_92 = vect__10.17_89 >= { 0, ... };
     119   │   _36 = vect__4.9_80 >> 63;
     120   │   mask__44.26_104 = vect__11.18_90 < { 0, ... };
     121   │   mask__43.27_105 = mask__46.19_92 & mask__44.26_104;
     122   │   _115 = .COND_XOR (mask__43.27_105, _36, { 9223372036854775807, 
... }, vect_sum_20.16_88);
     123   │   .MASK_LEN_STORE (vectp_out.29_108, 64B, { -1, ... }, _114, 0, 
_115);
     124   │   vectp_x.7_79 = vectp_x.7_78 + ivtmp_77;
     125   │   vectp_y.11_84 = vectp_y.11_83 + ivtmp_77;
     126   │   vectp_out.29_109 = vectp_out.29_108 + ivtmp_77;
     127   │   ivtmp_113 = ivtmp_112 - _114;
    
    After this patch:
      94   │   # vectp_x.7_82 = PHI <vectp_x.7_83(6), x_18(D)(5)>
      95   │   # vectp_y.10_86 = PHI <vectp_y.10_87(6), y_19(D)(5)>
      96   │   # vectp_out.14_91 = PHI <vectp_out.14_92(6), out_21(D)(5)>
      97   │   # ivtmp_95 = PHI <ivtmp_96(6), _94(5)>
      98   │   _97 = .SELECT_VL (ivtmp_95, POLY_INT_CST [2, 2]);
      99   │   ivtmp_81 = _97 * 8;
     100   │   vect__4.9_84 = .MASK_LEN_LOAD (vectp_x.7_82, 64B, { -1, ...  }, 
_97, 0);
     101   │   vect__7.12_88 = .MASK_LEN_LOAD (vectp_y.10_86, 64B, { -1, ...  
}, _97, 0);
     102   │   vect_patt_40.13_89 = .SAT_ADD (vect__4.9_84, vect__7.12_88);
     103   │   .MASK_LEN_STORE (vectp_out.14_91, 64B, { -1, ... }, _97, 0, 
vect_patt_40.13_89);
     104   │   vectp_x.7_83 = vectp_x.7_82 + ivtmp_81;
     105   │   vectp_y.10_87 = vectp_y.10_86 + ivtmp_81;
     106   │   vectp_out.14_92 = vectp_out.14_91 + ivtmp_81;
     107   │   ivtmp_96 = ivtmp_95 - _97;
    
    The below test suites are passed for this patch:
    1. The rv64gcv fully regression tests.
    2. The x86 bootstrap tests.
    3. The x86 fully regression tests.
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * match.pd: Add case 2 for the signed .SAT_ADD consumed by
            vect pattern.
            * tree-vect-patterns.cc (gimple_signed_integer_sat_add): Add new
            matching func decl for signed .SAT_ADD.
            (vect_recog_sat_add_pattern): Add signed .SAT_ADD pattern match.
    
    Signed-off-by: Pan Li <pan2...@intel.com>

Diff:
---
 gcc/match.pd              | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc |  5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index a664be5fe238..4cef965c9c7a 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -3221,6 +3221,22 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
        (bit_xor:c (negate (convert (lt @0 integer_zerop))) max_value))
  (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && !TYPE_UNSIGNED (type))))
 
+/* Signed saturation add, case 3:
+   T sum = (T)((UT)X + (UT)Y)
+   SAT_S_ADD = (X ^ Y) < 0 && (X ^ sum) >= 0 ? (-(T)(X < 0) ^ MAX) : sum;
+
+   The T and UT are type pair like T=int8_t, UT=uint8_t.  */
+(match (signed_integer_sat_add @0 @1)
+ (cond^ (bit_and:c (lt (bit_xor @0 (nop_convert@2 (plus (nop_convert @0)
+                                                       (nop_convert @1))))
+                      integer_zerop)
+                  (ge (bit_xor:c @0 @1) integer_zerop))
+       (bit_xor:c (nop_convert (negate (nop_convert (convert
+                                                     (lt @0 integer_zerop)))))
+                  max_value)
+       @2)
+ (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type) && !TYPE_UNSIGNED (type))))
+
 /* Unsigned saturation sub, case 1 (branch with gt):
    SAT_U_SUB = X > Y ? X - Y : 0  */
 (match (unsigned_integer_sat_sub @0 @1)
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
index 3a0d4cb7092c..a2bf90a575ae 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc
@@ -4497,6 +4497,8 @@ extern bool gimple_unsigned_integer_sat_add (tree, tree*, 
tree (*)(tree));
 extern bool gimple_unsigned_integer_sat_sub (tree, tree*, tree (*)(tree));
 extern bool gimple_unsigned_integer_sat_trunc (tree, tree*, tree (*)(tree));
 
+extern bool gimple_signed_integer_sat_add (tree, tree*, tree (*)(tree));
+
 static gimple *
 vect_recog_build_binary_gimple_stmt (vec_info *vinfo, stmt_vec_info stmt_info,
                                     internal_fn fn, tree *type_out,
@@ -4557,7 +4559,8 @@ vect_recog_sat_add_pattern (vec_info *vinfo, 
stmt_vec_info stmt_vinfo,
   tree ops[2];
   tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (last_stmt);
 
-  if (gimple_unsigned_integer_sat_add (lhs, ops, NULL))
+  if (gimple_unsigned_integer_sat_add (lhs, ops, NULL)
+      || gimple_signed_integer_sat_add (lhs, ops, NULL))
     {
       if (TREE_CODE (ops[1]) == INTEGER_CST)
        ops[1] = fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (ops[0]), ops[1]);

Reply via email to