https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e9e4777ca2415a73e8db64a406c06a79add621e5

commit r15-3476-ge9e4777ca2415a73e8db64a406c06a79add621e5
Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Sep 5 11:06:12 2024 +0200

    vrp: Fix up diagnostics wording
    
    I've noticed non-standard wording of this diagnostics when looking at
    a miscompilation with --param=vrp-block-limit=0.
    
    Diagnostics generally shouldn't start with uppercase letter (unless
    the upper case would appear also in the middle of a sentence) and shouldn't
    be separate sentences with dot as separator, ; is IMHO more frequently used.
    
    2024-09-05  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
    
            * tree-vrp.cc (pass_vrp::execute): Start diagnostics with
            lowercase u rather than capital U, use semicolon instead of dot.

Diff:
---
 gcc/tree-vrp.cc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/tree-vrp.cc b/gcc/tree-vrp.cc
index e184e9af51e..23946c57413 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vrp.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vrp.cc
@@ -1337,7 +1337,7 @@ public:
        {
          use_fvrp = true;
          warning (OPT_Wdisabled_optimization,
-                  "Using fast VRP algorithm. %d basic blocks"
+                  "using fast VRP algorithm; %d basic blocks"
                   " exceeds %<--param=vrp-block-limit=%d%> limit",
                   n_basic_blocks_for_fn (fun),
                   param_vrp_block_limit);

Reply via email to