https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d6360b4083695970789fd65b9c515c11a5ce25b4
commit r15-3414-gd6360b4083695970789fd65b9c515c11a5ce25b4
Author: Jan Hubicka <j...@suse.cz>
Date: Tue Sep 3 13:38:33 2024 +0200
Zen5 tuning part 1: avoid FMA chains
testing matrix multiplication benchmarks shows that FMA on a critical chain
is a perofrmance loss over separate multiply and add. While the latency of 4
is lower than multiply + add (3+2) the problem is that all values needs to
be ready before computation starts.
While on znver4 AVX512 code fared well with FMA, it was because of the split
registers. Znver5 benefits from avoding FMA on all widths. This may be
different
with the mobile version though.
On naive matrix multiplication benchmark the difference is 8% with -O3
only since with -Ofast loop interchange solves the problem differently.
It is 30% win, for example, on S323 from TSVC:
real_t s323(struct args_t * func_args)
{
// recurrences
// coupled recurrence
initialise_arrays(__func__);
gettimeofday(&func_args->t1, NULL);
for (int nl = 0; nl < iterations/2; nl++) {
for (int i = 1; i < LEN_1D; i++) {
a[i] = b[i-1] + c[i] * d[i];
b[i] = a[i] + c[i] * e[i];
}
dummy(a, b, c, d, e, aa, bb, cc, 0.);
}
gettimeofday(&func_args->t2, NULL);
return calc_checksum(__func__);
}
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/i386/x86-tune.def (X86_TUNE_AVOID_128FMA_CHAINS): Enable
for
znver5.
(X86_TUNE_AVOID_256FMA_CHAINS): Likewise.
(X86_TUNE_AVOID_512FMA_CHAINS): Likewise.
Diff:
---
gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def b/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def
index 3d29bffc49c3..da1a3d6a3c6c 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def
@@ -508,17 +508,18 @@ DEF_TUNE (X86_TUNE_USE_SCATTER_8PARTS,
"use_scatter_8parts",
/* X86_TUNE_AVOID_128FMA_CHAINS: Avoid creating loops with tight 128bit or
smaller FMA chain. */
-DEF_TUNE (X86_TUNE_AVOID_128FMA_CHAINS, "avoid_fma_chains", m_ZNVER1 |
m_ZNVER2 | m_ZNVER3 | m_ZNVER4
+DEF_TUNE (X86_TUNE_AVOID_128FMA_CHAINS, "avoid_fma_chains", m_ZNVER
| m_YONGFENG | m_SHIJIDADAO | m_GENERIC)
/* X86_TUNE_AVOID_256FMA_CHAINS: Avoid creating loops with tight 256bit or
smaller FMA chain. */
-DEF_TUNE (X86_TUNE_AVOID_256FMA_CHAINS, "avoid_fma256_chains", m_ZNVER2 |
m_ZNVER3 | m_ZNVER4
- | m_CORE_HYBRID | m_SAPPHIRERAPIDS | m_CORE_ATOM | m_GENERIC)
+DEF_TUNE (X86_TUNE_AVOID_256FMA_CHAINS, "avoid_fma256_chains",
+ m_ZNVER2 | m_ZNVER3 | m_ZNVER4 | m_ZNVER5 | m_CORE_HYBRID
+ | m_SAPPHIRERAPIDS | m_CORE_ATOM | m_GENERIC)
/* X86_TUNE_AVOID_512FMA_CHAINS: Avoid creating loops with tight 512bit or
smaller FMA chain. */
-DEF_TUNE (X86_TUNE_AVOID_512FMA_CHAINS, "avoid_fma512_chains", m_NONE)
+DEF_TUNE (X86_TUNE_AVOID_512FMA_CHAINS, "avoid_fma512_chains", m_ZNVER5)
/* X86_TUNE_V2DF_REDUCTION_PREFER_PHADDPD: Prefer haddpd
for v2df vector reduction. */
