https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e0b09c958f40e56da84c357a655096e005951cb7
commit e0b09c958f40e56da84c357a655096e005951cb7 Author: Jeff Law <j...@ventanamicro.com> Date: Sun Jun 23 08:26:25 2024 -0600 [committed][RISC-V][PR target/114139] Verify we have a CONST_INT before extracting INTVAL Run-of-the-mill checking issue. We had something like (plus (reg) (reg)) and tried to extract INTVAL (XEXP (x, 1)) which of course blows up with checking on. Fixed thusly. Tested on riscv32-elf in my tester. riscv64-elf is in flight, but won't finish for a while due to other tasks in flight. PR target/114139 gcc/ * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_macro_fusion_pair_p): Verify object is a CONST_INT before looking at INTVAL. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.target/riscv/pr114139.c: New test. (cherry picked from commit fd536b8412d4dae42aa04739c06f99a915be6261) Diff: --- gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 1 + gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114139.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc index 5c8ba68604b..fd4b81e61ae 100644 --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc @@ -9201,6 +9201,7 @@ riscv_macro_fusion_pair_p (rtx_insn *prev, rtx_insn *curr) && XINT (SET_SRC (prev_set), 1) == UNSPEC_AUIPC && (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (curr_set)) == LO_SUM || (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (curr_set)) == PLUS + && CONST_INT_P (XEXP (SET_SRC (curr_set), 1)) && SMALL_OPERAND (INTVAL (XEXP (SET_SRC (curr_set), 1)))))) return true; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114139.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114139.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1d4eeb65f5c --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr114139.c @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fpic -mexplicit-relocs -mcpu=sifive-p450" } */ + +static void *p; +extern void *a[]; +void +baz (void) +{ + p = 0; +} + +void bar (void); +void +foo (int i) +{ + bar (); + a[i] = p; +} + + +double *d; +void +foobar (int i) +{ + for (; i; ++i) + d[i] = 1; +}