https://gcc.gnu.org/g:33663c0701a723846527f9bf2ea01d67d7033c0b
commit r12-10555-g33663c0701a723846527f9bf2ea01d67d7033c0b Author: Alex Coplan <alex.cop...@arm.com> Date: Fri May 3 09:23:59 2024 +0100 cfgrtl: Fix MEM_EXPR update in duplicate_insn_chain [PR114924] The PR shows that when cfgrtl.cc:duplicate_insn_chain attempts to update the MR_DEPENDENCE_CLIQUE information for a MEM_EXPR we can end up accidentally dropping (e.g.) an ARRAY_REF from the MEM_EXPR and end up replacing it with the underlying MEM_REF. This leads to an inconsistency in the MEM_EXPR information, and could lead to wrong code. While the walk down to the MEM_REF is necessary to update MR_DEPENDENCE_CLIQUE, we should use the outer tree expression for the MEM_EXPR. This patch does that. gcc/ChangeLog: PR rtl-optimization/114924 * cfgrtl.cc (duplicate_insn_chain): When updating MEM_EXPRs, don't strip (e.g.) ARRAY_REFs from the final MEM_EXPR. (cherry picked from commit fe40d525619eee9c2821126390df75068df4773a) Diff: --- gcc/cfgrtl.cc | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/cfgrtl.cc b/gcc/cfgrtl.cc index 8decf4007e83..a8c95d82a2a7 100644 --- a/gcc/cfgrtl.cc +++ b/gcc/cfgrtl.cc @@ -4374,12 +4374,13 @@ duplicate_insn_chain (rtx_insn *from, rtx_insn *to, since MEM_EXPR is shared so make a copy and walk to the subtree again. */ tree new_expr = unshare_expr (MEM_EXPR (*iter)); + tree orig_new_expr = new_expr; if (TREE_CODE (new_expr) == WITH_SIZE_EXPR) new_expr = TREE_OPERAND (new_expr, 0); while (handled_component_p (new_expr)) new_expr = TREE_OPERAND (new_expr, 0); MR_DEPENDENCE_CLIQUE (new_expr) = newc; - set_mem_expr (const_cast <rtx> (*iter), new_expr); + set_mem_expr (const_cast <rtx> (*iter), orig_new_expr); } } }