https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b409fc34e9b1ff7f90456e73128e38970c1532b
commit r13-8720-g0b409fc34e9b1ff7f90456e73128e38970c1532b Author: Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> Date: Mon Nov 20 13:39:52 2023 +0100 tree-optimization/112281 - loop distribution and zero dependence distances The following fixes an omission in dependence testing for loop distribution. When the overall dependence distance is not zero but the dependence direction in the innermost common loop is = there is a conflict between the partitions and we have to merge them. PR tree-optimization/112281 * tree-loop-distribution.cc (loop_distribution::pg_add_dependence_edges): For = in the innermost common loop record a partition conflict. * gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-1.c: New testcase. * gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-2.c: Likewise. (cherry picked from commit 3b34902417259031823bff7f853f615a60464bbd) Diff: --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-1.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-2.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ gcc/tree-loop-distribution.cc | 18 ++++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-1.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..711f5663195c --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-1.c @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +/* { dg-do run } */ +/* { dg-additional-options "-ftree-loop-distribution" } */ + +struct { + int : 8; + int a; +} b, d[4] = {{0}, {0}, {0}, {5}}; +int c, e; +int main() { + for (c = 2; c; c--) + for (e = 0; e < 2; e++) { + d[c] = b = d[c + 1]; + d[c + 1].a = 0; + } + if (b.a != 0) + __builtin_abort(); + return 0; +} diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-2.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d7671e3322b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr112281-2.c @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +/* { dg-do run } */ +/* { dg-additional-options "-ftree-loop-distribution" } */ + +struct { + int : 8; + int a; +} b, d[4] = {{5}, {0}, {0}, {0}}; +int c, e; +int main() { + for (c = 0; c < 2; c++) + for (e = 0; e < 2; e++) { + d[c + 1] = b = d[c]; + d[c].a = 0; + } + if (b.a != 0) + __builtin_abort(); + return 0; +} diff --git a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.cc b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.cc index c674da97b02f..3d92d1c73b5f 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.cc +++ b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.cc @@ -2152,9 +2152,6 @@ loop_distribution::pg_add_dependence_edges (struct graph *rdg, int dir, } else if (DDR_ARE_DEPENDENT (ddr) == NULL_TREE) { - if (DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr)) - this_dir = -this_dir; - /* Known dependences can still be unordered througout the iteration space, see gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-16.c and gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr94969.c. */ @@ -2167,7 +2164,20 @@ loop_distribution::pg_add_dependence_edges (struct graph *rdg, int dir, /* Else as the distance vector is lexicographic positive swap the dependence direction. */ else - this_dir = -this_dir; + { + if (DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr)) + this_dir = -this_dir; + this_dir = -this_dir; + + /* When then dependence distance of the innermost common + loop of the DRs is zero we have a conflict. */ + auto l1 = gimple_bb (DR_STMT (dr1))->loop_father; + auto l2 = gimple_bb (DR_STMT (dr2))->loop_father; + int idx = index_in_loop_nest (find_common_loop (l1, l2)->num, + DDR_LOOP_NEST (ddr)); + if (DDR_DIST_VECT (ddr, 0)[idx] == 0) + this_dir = 2; + } } else this_dir = 0;