https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a46a48ebc7b7b3976af49f6f8dabd65c6ddf64b

commit r14-9641-g4a46a48ebc7b7b3976af49f6f8dabd65c6ddf64b
Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Date:   Sat Mar 23 11:20:00 2024 +0100

    bitint: Fix bitfield loads in handle_cast [PR114433]
    
    We ICE on the following testcase, because handle_cast was incorrectly
    testing !m_first to see whether it should use m_data[m_bitfld_load + 1]
    or fresh SSA_NAME for a PHI result.
    Now, m_first is in the routine sometimes temporarily cleared in between
    doing prepare_data_in_out and the !m_first check and only before returning
    restored from the save_first copy.
    Without this patch, we try to use the same SSA_NAME (_12 here) in 2
    different PHI results which is obviously invalid IL and ICEs very quickly.
    
    2024-03-23  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
    
            PR tree-optimization/114433
            * gimple-lower-bitint.cc (bitint_large_huge::handle_cast): For
            m_bitfld_load check save_first rather than m_first.
    
            * gcc.dg/torture/bitint-68.c: New test.

Diff:
---
 gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc               |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-68.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc b/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc
index 6f13c657c6b..40a1084afb3 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-lower-bitint.cc
@@ -1506,7 +1506,7 @@ bitint_large_huge::handle_cast (tree lhs_type, tree rhs1, 
tree idx)
          if (m_bitfld_load)
            {
              tree t4;
-             if (!m_first)
+             if (!save_first)
                t4 = m_data[m_bitfld_load + 1];
              else
                t4 = make_ssa_name (m_limb_type);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-68.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-68.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8320e8ea6e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/bitint-68.c
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/114433 */
+/* { dg-do run { target bitint } } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c23" } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! run_expensive_tests }  { "*" } { "-O0" "-O2" } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! run_expensive_tests } { "-flto" } { "" } } */
+
+#if __BITINT_MAXWIDTH__ >= 511
+struct S { int : 31; _BitInt(511) b : 300; } s;
+
+__attribute__((noipa)) _BitInt(511)
+foo (void) 
+{
+  return s.b << 1;
+}
+#endif
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+#if __BITINT_MAXWIDTH__ >= 511
+  s.b = 
642460398785925402356009598661384732715767737595497615767135001949421105426024498988100867wb;
+  if (foo () != ((_BitInt(511)) 
642460398785925402356009598661384732715767737595497615767135001949421105426024498988100867wb)
 << 1)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  s.b = 
2655156766298562299560755420298083843774074962786295887660222690220887wb;
+  if (foo () != ((_BitInt(511)) 
2655156766298562299560755420298083843774074962786295887660222690220887wb) << 1)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+#endif
+}

Reply via email to