------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-01-24 23:33 ------- > Yes, I see that. My eyes crossed while transcribing the algorithm to trees, > and I failed to notice that a computation is (b - (a * ratio)) in one branch > and ((a * ratio) - b) in the other. And so incorrectly believed that the > branches could be rewritten to share code.
Indeed, I can imagine: unfortunately, a few more lines are apparently needed. Anyway, a lot of people will appreciate this work! P.S. Beware that both the real and the imaginary part are different in the two branches ;) The roles of a and b are swapped in both cases. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19609
