------- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-23 19:44 ------- Gcse store motion could catch this as well (if I understand PR 19580 well, it does not, which is a bug), so this pr alone would not be a reason to block removal of old loop optimizer. However hopefully we should have a usable alias analysis on tree level in 4.1, of course.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19581
