------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-01-22 18:28 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] libgcc2.h Improperly determines required built-in function size requirements.
Any reason that the milestone was removed vs. moved to 4.1 for tertiary platforms? > From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > ------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-21 > There are no 8-bit or 16-bit targets in the primary or secondary platform > lists; removing target milestone. > > -- > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Target Milestone|4.0.0 |--- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18887 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18887
