------- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-01-21 13:55 ------- (In reply to comment #17) > And IMHO this shoul be perfectly > valid, since the operands to the asm construction are all marked as "m" (!!!), > so no registers should be needed for that!
Huh? The memory operands are not at a compile time constant address, so of course you need a register to hold them. Of course, you need only one register for all of them, but you explicitely disallowed gcc to discover that by specifying -O0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11203
