------- Additional Comments From marcus at jet dot franken dot de 2005-01-20
13:44 -------
well, i am not specifying the NULL, the code actually has "NULL".
However it gets defined by the gcc stdef.h file:
#if defined (_STDDEF_H) || defined (__need_NULL)
#undef NULL /* in case <stdio.h> has defined it. */
#ifdef __GNUG__
#define NULL __null
#else /* G++ */
#ifndef __cplusplus
#define NULL ((void *)0)
#else /* C++ */
#define NULL 0
#endif /* C++ */
#endif /* G++ */
#endif /* NULL not defined and <stddef.h> or need NULL. */
#undef __need_NULL
So:
- is gcc wrong?
- should the code always use (type*)NULL in such vararg lists?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19542
