------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-18
23:12 -------
> This is a midde-end problem .... (investing further)
> but we end up with an empty CONSTRUTOR and the middle-end is not expanding it
> correctly for the union.
Right, the 3.4.x back-end used to zero the whole aggregate if the constructor
was lacking elements.
And this is really critical according to the criterion.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19515
