------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-18 02:00 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/921215-1.c compilation -O3 -g
On Mon, 18 Jan 2005, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca > 2005-01-18 01:32 ------- > Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/921215-1 > >> I'll fix this bug, but you guys should understand that you aren't going to >> get >> sane debug info under stabs at -Ox anyway right now (and haven't since >> rouhgly >> the tree-ssa merge), since it still assumes that blocks that aren't used >> don't >> have used subblocks. > > Is this a PR? No. Apparently, nobody noticed (IE it only happens at -O1+) :). However, if you take the testcases from the prs that let to blocks being marked used, you should be able to come up with a testcase for this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19327
