------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-17 
23:56 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Doesn't ICE with gcc-3.3 (but TImode arithmetic is incomplete here too). 
> Glibc assumes that __uint128_t is defined for gcc >= 3.1. 

Well if TImode is incomplete why support it?

See PR 17279 which is why __uint128_t does not get defined.

I would take Alan's advice in
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-01/msg00513.html>.

See RTH's patch here which basically made TImode not avaiable in 32bit mdoe:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-08/msg02114.html

If anything should be the case, we should not create another regression, PR 
17279 was a regression in 
3.4.0 from 3.3.3 on powerpc-darwin because HWI was 32bit and changed to 64bit 
for 3.4.0 but since 
TImode is rejected we don't get an ICE either.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |minor
            Summary|[3.4/4.0 regression] TImode |TImode is not supported on
                   |no longer supported on      |powerpc
                   |powerpc                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19493

Reply via email to