------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-17 03:15 ------- (In reply to comment #5) Considering this was done over a year ago and nobody complained about it then, I am going to say this should stay closed as there is no good way to define typeof for a type field.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10333
