------- Additional Comments From gianni at mariani dot ws 2005-01-14 06:47 -------
> Quoting the standard again (the same passage which we all quoted): James Kanze added a comment in this bug - I'll quote it here: > The context of the quote from the standard is: > "If the constructor of the most derived class does not > specify a mem-initializer for the virtual base class > V ...". In the code submitted, the constructor of the > most derived class DOES specify a mem-initializer, so > none of what follows applies. Comments ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249