------- Additional Comments From fnf at specifixinc dot com 2005-01-13 20:56 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Current development gcc generates incorrect line info for example code
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 11:46, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote: > Give this a try. Unfortunately, for my original example, this seems to have made things worse. The differences are: $ diff -w ../old/z.m ../new/z.m 6,8c6,7 < Special opcode 234: advance Address by 16 to 0x80483c1 and Line by 5 to 13 < Advance PC by constant 17 to 0x80483d2 < Special opcode 34: advance Address by 2 to 0x80483d4 and Line by 1 to 14 --- > Advance PC by 35 to 80483d4 > Special opcode 11: advance Address by 0 to 0x80483d4 and Line by 6 to 14 20,23c19,22 < 13 80483c1: c7 04 24 c8 84 04 08 movl $0x80484c8,(%esp) < 13 80483c8: 83 c0 02 add $0x2,%eax < 13 80483cb: 89 44 24 04 mov %eax,0x4(%esp) < 13 80483cf: e8 dc fe ff ff call 80482b0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- > 8 80483c1: c7 04 24 c8 84 04 08 movl $0x80484c8,(%esp) > 8 80483c8: 83 c0 02 add $0x2,%eax > 8 80483cb: 89 44 24 04 mov %eax,0x4(%esp) > 8 80483cf: e8 dc fe ff ff call 80482b0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I.E. gcc now associates the code to print the results with line 8 instead of line 13. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19192
