------- Additional Comments From joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-11 14:46 ------- I think I did mess up the version string. I am trying to use the RTEMS RPMs scripts to build a snapshot set of RPMs to do full testing with. With a name like gcc-4.0-DATE, it messes up some of the patterns. I hacked the version number to be gcc-4.0.0.20050109 and it obviously broke.
It is hard to come up with a meaningful hack on the version number that makes both gcc and RPM happy. I am past this now and will close this. Hopefully I will be able to report real problems in a little while. <sigh> -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19372