------- Additional Comments From joel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-11 14:46 
-------
I think I did mess up the version string.  I am trying to use the RTEMS RPMs
scripts to build a snapshot set of RPMs to do full testing with.  With a name
like gcc-4.0-DATE, it messes up some of the patterns.  I hacked the version
number to be gcc-4.0.0.20050109 and it obviously broke.  

It is hard to come up with a meaningful hack on the version number that makes 
both gcc and RPM happy. 

I am past this now and will close this.  Hopefully I will be able to report real
problems in a little while. <sigh>

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19372

Reply via email to