------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-09 23:11 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > There's no multiplication in the source code. The multiplication is an > implementation detail. You can hardly use it to justify the semantics of the > operation.
Actually the multiplication is not an implementation detail. The standard says what opator new[] should be passed, just the multiplication is included. sizeof(int[i]) (well if it was valid C++, it is valid C99) is defined as a multiplication so it is not an implemenation detail. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19351
