This PR is a place holder for the following fails which I believe
all relate to problems passing complex long double arguments.

FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-2.c execution,  -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-2.c execution,  -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-2.c execution,  -Os

and

FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-6.c execution,  -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-6.c execution,  -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-6.c execution,  -Os
FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-3 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o execute
FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/scalar-return-3 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o execute
FAIL: gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-18 c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o execute

These regressions were introduced between Fri Nov 26 01:33:55 UTC
and Sat Nov 27 22:23:58 UTC 2004.

-- 
           Summary: [4.0 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010605-
                    2.c execution,  -O1
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
  GCC host triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19330

Reply via email to