------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 17:35 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I don't think PR 18476 needs to be in there. The test case is > invalid (just putting nml instead of nml= into the list).
I don't understand your parenthetical remark. Please see my comment to PR18476: g77 gives a runtime error, but compiles this flawlessly. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19292
