------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-03 21:10 ------- (In reply to comment #30) (In reply to comment #31) > I'm not sure if it's the root cause yet, or just an interesting rat hole, but > we do not create any virtual operands for the *addr = <whatever> statement > (or for any statement with volatile operands).
Note if I remove the volatile from the example in comment #30, then it works so it looks like that is root call because we don't know if we use the result of path[0]. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18241
