------- Additional Comments From austern at apple dot com 2005-01-03 20:55 ------- Subject: Re: Misleading error message for ill-formed explicit destructor invocation
On Jan 3, 2005, at 12:49 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org > 2005-01-03 20:49 ------- > Hmm, I think this is valid code and should not be rejected, see DR 272 > and PR 12333 (which I think this > is a dup of). DR 272 is in "WP" status, meaning it's part of the working paper for C++0x. It's not part of the International Standard ISO/IEC 14882:2003. I couldn't find anything in the standard saying that it was acceptable to write an explicit destructor call using a qualified-id. Did I miss something? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19243
