------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-12-29 19:05 ------- > Did I already open a PR for this misbehaviour in the past? What > happened?
Yes, Gaby, the issue at large is clear, by now: see c++/17743. Here, we are just trying to achieve *minimal* functionality, when the espression in the attribute is not dependent: among other things (currently __align__ inside templates is *totally* broken :( this would allow me to provide a decent first implementation of aligned_storage via specializations for Align=1,2,4,8,16 There is an updated patch ready, which seems to me rather safe http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg02003.html Paolo. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19163
