------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-12-23 23:17 ------- > I'm not sure whether this special > case here immediately follows from fixing PR 18902.
It does, indeed, this one is a *really* a special case: have a look to the test case that I have attached to 18902 (and verified fixed by a preliminary patch ;) But, if we want to keep both open, it's ok with me! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19138
