------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2004-12-16 14:23 ------- Subject: Re: UCNs not recognized in identifiers (c++/c99)
On examination of the different lists in C and C++, I'd add the use of UCNs accepted in one language only to the cases that should receive a default warning (identifiers not in NFKC receiving such a warning as well). Most extreme, but assuring any case which might have a compatibility problem is warned for, would be also to warn for any character with a canonical or compatibility decomposition and for any character with nonzero combining class. This area is just one of many where C and C++ give programmers more than enough rope to hang themselves. In general we give due warning in such cases then let the programmers go ahead if they really want to. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9449
