------- Additional Comments From david at starks-browning dot com 2004-12-16 10:30 ------- True, but I don't believe the patch for PR16273 is applicable to gcc-3.3. In fact, I am unable to reproduce the fault in gcc-3.3 using the 10,000-line test case that was attached to PR16273. Therefore, my guess is that the smaller test case (attachment id 6664) was refined against gcc-3.4 and led to the patch that fixed the symptom in gcc-3.4. I don't know how much of that effort could be applied to gcc-3.3.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19018