------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-13
15:36 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Subject: Re: Profiling optimized code causes segfaults on
> ARM due to missing frames
>
> Two things
>
> 1. Why do you not think the patch is correct? It works great for
> me. Without
> that information, I can only respond with "I think you are wrong,"
> and that
> is not productive.
Here is why it is the correct fix, the patch you are asking to apply is a patch
to the middle-end which
works for all targets already and there is no reason to say we need a frame
pointer when profiling.
The fix which Richard suggested (which by the way if you tried 3.4.0 you would
see that it was fixed,
like I had asked) is a target only fix, preventing the scheduling across to the
profiling area for the
function. So this in turn a dup of bug 3724 which is fixed for 3.4.0.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3724 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18929
