Test case from a post on comp.lang.fortran.
$ cat dud.f90
!From: "James Van Buskirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
!Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
!Subject: Re: sizeof equivalent in fortran 90 programs
!Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
!Organization: Comcast Online
!Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:00:01 GMT
!
!"Rich Townsend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
!news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
!
!> Apologies for overlooking your post.
!
!No problem. It just gave me an opportunity to get on my hobby
!horse about initialization expressions. Regarding my hobby
!horse about specification expressions, try using CVF to compile:
!
module helper
implicit none
contains
function dud(x)
integer, intent(in) :: x
character(selected_int_kind(x)+2) dud
dud = repeat('x',len(dud))
end function dud
end module helper
program sik
use helper
implicit none
integer i
integer, parameter :: s(-5:5) = (/(selected_int_kind(i),i=-5,5)/)
do i = -5, 5
write(*,'(4i4)') i,selected_int_kind(i),s(i),len(dud(i))-2
end do
end program sik
!and compare with lf95 or g95.
!
!--
!write(*,*) transfer((/17.392111325966148d0,6.5794487871554595D-85, &
!6.0134700243160014d-154/),(/'x'/)); end
$ gfortran dud.f90
dud.f90: In function 'dud':
dud.f90:20: internal compiler error: in gfc_finish_var_decl, at
fortran/trans-decl.c:416
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
$ gfortran -v
Reading specs from /home/ig25/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.0/specs
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/ig25
--enable-languages=c,c++,f95 --disable-shared : (reconfigured) ../gcc/configure
--prefix=/home/ig25 --disable-shared
--with-gcc-version-trigger=/home/ig25/gcc/gcc/version.c
--enable-languages=c,c++,f95 --no-create --no-recursion
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.0 20041206 (experimental)
$
--
Summary: ICE in gfc_finish_var_decl
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18883
