------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-05 
15:16 -------
Actually I was the one who said this was a regressions by looking into the CVS 
history but that the 
change which I said causes it was one which changed the code to be better and 
it was actually broken 
before that too.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression]    |#pragma pack(1) breaks
                   |#pragma pack(1) breaks      |function pointer
                   |function pointer            |initialization
                   |initialization              |
   Target Milestone|3.4.4                       |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18443

Reply via email to