https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126811

Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |patch

--- Comment #9 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #8)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
> > Created attachment 65619 [details]
> > revised fix
> > 
> > This handles the cases where it is valid to pass a folded tree to
> > tsubst_expr (it requires reversion of the applied patch).  With this
> > approach the original (PR126811) and the successor (PR127395, PR127439) all
> > pass.
> 
> Two weeks have elapsed. Did this patch ever make it into trunk ?
> 
> If needs be, I can help with testing.

You can try
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/[email protected]/.

Reply via email to