------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-01
21:22 -------
Confirmed, I think what is really is happening is not actually due with the
cost of [reg +reg] but really
with the additional code of "(double *) coefPtr" which we should really be zero.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |missed-optimization
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-12-01 21:22:47
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18768
