https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126153
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Wed, 2 Sep 2026, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126153 > > --- Comment #21 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Bah, IPA-CP is not really supposed to try anything at non-byte-aligned > offsets. > The (rather long-term) plan is to encode stuff in bytes to make WPA > structures > smaller, which is why ipa_argagg_value_list uses bytes. I am surprised > bit-aligned accesses even got this far :-/ Heh. I wonder if a truncated bit position (excluding very large offsets) is better in practice though. bitfields do matter - unless we want to track them in (implicitly?) lowered form.
