------- Additional Comments From prez at neuromancy dot net 2004-11-27 16:04 ------- (In reply to comment #21) > *** Bug 18688 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Is it really a dupe? The bug I raised only involved a templated argument, the class with the member function is not templated. Besides which, if its invalid as a member function, why is it not invalid stand-alone? And why should typedef's get around it? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57
