------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-11-24 17:38 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] array bound rejected as non-constant in template
giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-24 > 10:05 ------- > Yes, Mark, but it used to work just a few weeks ago, and it is a > rejects-valid. I understand. That's why I left the target for this PR set at 4.0. We have an ever-growing list of these, with respect to using-declarations. None of these have ever worked correctly; they've all worked because we made various mistakes in name lookup. Every time we fix name lookup, we introduce more problems with using-declarations, because our using-declarations are not really using-declarations, but just access specifiers. For example, we broke things in this area when we introduced two-phase name lookup. The correct fix -- and, I suspect, the only correct fix -- is to implement using-declarations for classes correctly. I'd love to do that, but depending on how big of a job it is, it may not happen for 4.0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18470
