------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-24
00:44 -------
After rereading the thread which talked about this, this should be closed as
not a bug.
The thread starts here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-01/msg00660.html
And the email which comments on why this is not a bug is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-01/msg00665.html
"
> Newer GCCs do not write the weak symbol:
Correct. The the assembly above is meaningless. It "works" in that it
assembles, but it doesn't do anything useful. One could even argue that
it's a bug that it assembles.
"
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7544
