https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103221
Drea Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #14 from Drea Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Drea Pinski from comment #13)
> (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #12)
> > copyprop does run a few passes after VRP1, but looks like that is the first
> > one, and it was never run after EVRP.
> > EVRP is now identical to a full VRP pass, so it makes sense that we should
> > run copyprop somewhere after it.. it can do all the same things and probably
> > exposes opportunities like you have.
>
> Maybe move pass_sccopy before the first phiopt instead. Since pass_sccopy
> will do the copy-prop. phiopt could introduce a copy in some cases but not
> enough to care about for inlining reasons.
I am going to test that.
