https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125215
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I cherry-picked it into gcc-16. The code got meaningfully refactored in gcc-16, so it'd have to be hand applied to gcc-15. Given it's wrong code I'd lean towards doing that hand application. But we can kick it around on Tuesday to see if there's strong opinions against.
