https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125439
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Read the definition of signed and unsigned integers types, it's a list of types
that does not include cv-qualified versions of those types.
Contrast that with https://eel.is/c++draft/basic.fundamental#11 which says "the
signed and unsigned integer types, and cv-qualified versions
([basic.type.qualifier]) thereof". If signed and unsigned integers types
already included const versions, it wouldn't need to say "and cv-qualified
versions thereof".
