------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-11-22 15:05 ------- Substitution of the return type fails, so in your example there really is an empty set of overloads. That's what the compiler tells you. I think the fact that we may print a message saying that the overload set is empty but that there are functions of the same name that aren't viable has been discussed in at least one other PR already. W.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18610
